Theblack bars will be wider for the movie shot in 2.39:1 than they will on the 1.85:1 video. However, if you want to fill the screen, then 16:9 is the best ratio. Content for YouTube or Netflix is made in 16:9 ratio. If you’re going to share a video on Facebook, it can accommodate aspect ratios of 16:9, 9:16, 4:5, 2:3, or 1:1.
178 (16:9) 1920 x 1080: 1.85: 1920 x 1038: 1.90: 1920 x 1010: 2.00: 1920 x 960: 2.35: 1920 x 816: 2.37: 1920 x 810: 2.39: 1920 x 802: 2.40: 1920 x 800: 2.44: 1920 x 786 . 720p Aspect Ratio Resolution; 0.80 (4:5) 576 x 720: 1.25 (5:4) 900 x 720: 1.33 (4:3) 960 x 720: 1.66 (5:3) 1200 x 720: 1.78 (16:9) 1280 x 720: 1.85: 1280 x 692: 1.90: 1280 x
The16:9 aspect ratio describes a width of 16 units and a height of 9 units. Depending on the device, you can measure a unit in pixels, inches, or millimeters, for example. Technically, the 16:9 format is an aspect ratio of 1.77:1 or 1.78:1, because 16 divided by 9 is 1.777. Film and TV productions use that equivalent ratio to talk about the Itis achieved either by cropping a 16:9 frame or by using anamorphic lenses to squeeze the image horizontally. Note that many cameras offer 2.35:1 framing guides rather than 2.39:1, but the difference is negligible, and these two designations are used pretty much interchangeably, as well as 2.40:1. On TV, VOD and so on, 2.39:1 movies are Anamorphicwidescreen (also called full-height anamorphic or FHA) is a process by which a comparatively wide widescreen image is horizontally compressed to fit into a storage medium (photographic film or MPEG-2 standard-definition frame, for example) with a narrower aspect ratio, reducing the horizontal resolution of the image while keeping its
Allanamorphic, Super 35 or digital scope movies made since 1970 have been composed for and projected at .40:1. And yet, many people in the industry continue to use the term “2.35:1

Thedownside of a 2.35:1 screen is that 16:9 content will be pillarboxed. Additionally, most projectors are going to have 16:9 as their native aspect ratio. If you are watching content

Isthere a consensus opinion from you experts? Can you help me with recommendations on what aspect ratio screen to purchase for a new HT with : Sim300+ dlp-2 projector 2 seating rows about 11-12 ft and 15-16 feet from screen. Viewing material dvd's and satellie movies mostly, but fair Thesimple answer is this. Most people are opting for a 16:9 screen since it is a good compromise that fits a lot of movie formats without too much letterboxing or pillar boxing, Its the size of the image expressed as a ratio, width to height. You'll often see film-making aspect ratios expressed as a value to 1 (like to 2.35:1 and 1.85:1 mentioned earlier), whereas the most common photography aspect ratios are 3:2, 4:3, and 1:1, although there are plenty more besides. If your image has an aspect ratio of 3:2, it will
A16:9 screen has a ratio of 1.78:1 so is therefore not quite as wide as a 1.85:1 screen of the same height. 16:9 of course is the standard ratio for almost all widescreen sets (tube and RPTV). With front projection of course, you can order basically any screen size/ratio you want. However, most people get 16:9 or 4:3 depending on their
Bothwith 16:9 and 2.35:1, most times I prefer smaller 16:9 diagonal size than 2.35 from same distance. Of course there are always exceptions, some Imax movies and documentations like Planet Earth, demands bigger size than scope movies. But I think theese presentations represent under 1-2% to total consumption.
235 widescreen aspect ratio image common with many movies released on Blu-ray and from streaming services. Notice the extra detail to the left and the right that is ThePerfect Solution – 16:9. The primary reason why 16:9 is such a perfect aspect ratio for multimedia devices is that it is roughly the average of 4:3 and 2.35:1. No single screen can possibly display all kinds of films without any distortion, but 16:9 comes the closest. 16:9 screens achieve this feat through 2 methods: Pillarboxing CtF2y2S.
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/495
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/453
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/474
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/413
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/179
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/165
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/129
  • qq3flxr0p5.pages.dev/64

    • 2.35 1 vs 16 9